SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.14484

Madhava's Pi-Series in the Modern Context

Abstract

The $\pi$-series is attributed to Madhava, Gregory and Leibniz based on the chronology of its discovery. While this acknowledges the fact that Madhava of Sangamagrama an Indian mathematician who lived in Kerala in the 14th century along the banks of river Nila, was the first to discover the series, the modern day proof for the $\pi$-series is based on the outline of the proof given by the famous German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in the 17th century, using concepts and rigorous definitions of Calculus many of which were developed after his lifetime. We extend the same benefit to Madhava's ideas and present Madhava's upapatti i.e proof for the $\pi$-series as given in Jyesthadeva's Yuktibhasha using modern notation and definitions. We elaborate Madhava's proof at three places (a) to prove that the arc-bit sum is same as the sum of arc-bit approximations (b) to prove convergence and (c) to concisely prove by iteration the power sum approximation. Madhava's method with appropriate changes can be applied to derive the sine and cosine series as well. Madhava also provides the correction terms to accelerate the convergence of the $\pi$-series. We compare the two proofs i.e Madhava's and the popular proof for $\pi$ which is based on Leibniz's ideas and observe that they are different since Madhava's is based on the length of the arc where as Leibniz's relies on the area under the arc and in terms of the number of concepts from advanced calculus used in the the two proofs Madhava's proof stands out for its simplicity, thus making a case for it to be appreciated, popularised and taught as the original proof of the $\pi$-series.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Harikrishna VJ, Vittal Rao, Srikrishna Bhat. 2026-02-16. Madhava's Pi-Series in the Modern Context. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14484

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO