arXiv · 2602.14943
Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs
Abstract
Diestel and K\"uhn proved that the topological ends of an infinite graph are precisely its undominated graph ends, yielding a canonical embedding of the space of topological ends into the space of graph ends. For edge-ends, introduced by Hahn, Laviolette and \v{S}ir\'a\v{n}, such an embedding does not exist in general. In this note, we characterize the class of infinite graphs for which the topological ends admit a natural injective map into the space of edge-ends that is compatible with the canonical maps between end spaces. Our characterization is purely combinatorial and is expressed in terms of edge-equivalence classes of vertices. Moreover, when such an embedding exists, we identify precisely which edge-ends arise from topological ends, showing that they are exactly the edge-ends containing a non-dominated ray. This establishes a parallel result to the theorem of Diestel and K\"uhn for edge-end spaces.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Leandro Aurichi, Paulo Magalhães Júnior, Guilherme Eduardo Pinto. 2026-02-16. Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14943
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.