SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2602.16026

Bad Foundations and Manipulable Objects

Abstract

Imagine a student -- let's call him `E', and make him a "he" -- that is enrolled in Calculus 2, and who believes that to pass in maths courses he only needs to memorize methods and apply them quickly and without errors. Let's imagine that `E' is an `E'xtreme case of "bad foundations" and that he knows how to solve $x+2=5$ by doing $x=5-2=3$, but he doesn't know how to substitute the $x$ in $x+2=5$ by 3, and the only way that he knows of "testing the solution" is to apply the same method again and check that he got the same result. When we are teaching Calculus to classes that have many students that are extreme cases of bad foundations we need new strategies and tools; for example, we can't pretend that "taking a particular case" is an obvious operation anymore -- instead we need ways to make these operations easy to visualize. This article shows a way to do that using Maxima.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eduardo Ochs. 2026-02-17. Bad Foundations and Manipulable Objects. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO