arXiv · 2602.16973
Lies, Labels, and Mechanisms
Abstract
We test whether lying aversion can steer equilibrium selection in mechanism design. In a principal-worker environment, the direct mechanism admits two dominant-strategy equilibria: the designer's target and a worker-optimal outcome. We show this limitation persists for all robust mechanisms, then ask whether framing misreports as explicit lies helps. We develop a 2X2 experiment that varies direct vs. extended mechanisms with implicit vs. explicit messages. We find that framing misreporting of type as an explicit lie shifts play away from the worker-optimal outcome toward truthful reporting, raising designer payoffs with minimal efficiency loss. These findings indicate that lying aversion is an effective lever for aligning behavior with social objectives.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Alex L. Brown, Ethan Park, Rodrigo A. Velez. 2026-02-19. Lies, Labels, and Mechanisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16973
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.