Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.19879

The Bidirected Cut Relaxation for Steiner Tree: Better Integrality Gap Bounds and the Limits of Moat Growing

Paul Paschmanns·Vera Traub
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Steiner Tree problem asks for the cheapest way of connecting a given subset of the vertices in an undirected graph. One of the most prominent linear programming relaxations for Steiner Tree is the Bidirected Cut Relaxation (BCR). Determining the integrality gap of this relaxation is a long-standing open question. For several decades, the best known upper bound was 2, which is achievable by standard techniques. Only very recently, Byrka, Grandoni, and Traub [FOCS 2024] showed that the integrality gap of BCR is strictly below 2. We prove that the integrality gap of BCR is at most 1.898, improving significantly on the previous bound of 1.9988. For the important special case where a terminal minimum spanning tree is an optimal Steiner tree, we show that the integrality gap is at most 12/7, by providing a tight analysis of the dual-growth procedure by Byrka et al. To obtain the general bound of 1.898 on the integrality gap, we generalize their dual growth procedure to a broad class of moat-growing algorithms. Moreover, we prove that no such moat-growing algorithm yields dual solutions certifying an integrality gap below 12/7. Finally, we observe an interesting connection to the Hypergraphic Relaxation.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paul Paschmanns, Vera Traub. 2026-02-23. The Bidirected Cut Relaxation for Steiner Tree: Better Integrality Gap Bounds and the Limits of Moat Growing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19879

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗