Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.01588

Jump Like A Squirrel: Optimized Execution Step Order for Anytime Random Forest Inference

Daniel Biebert·Christian Hakert·Kay Heider·Daniel Kuhse·Sebastian Buschjäger·Jian-Jia Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Due to their efficiency and small size, decision trees and random forests are popular machine learning models used for classification on resource-constrained systems. In such systems, the available execution time for inference in a random forest might not be sufficient for a complete model execution. Ideally, the already gained prediction confidence should be retained. An anytime algorithm is designed to be able to be aborted anytime, while giving a result with an increasing quality over time. Previous approaches have realized random forests as anytime algorithms on the granularity of trees, stopping after some but not all trees of a forest have been executed. However, due to the way decision trees subdivide the sample space in every step, an increase in prediction quality is achieved with every additional step in one tree. In this paper, we realize decision trees and random forest as anytime algorithms on the granularity of single steps in trees. This approach opens a design space to define the step order in a forest, which has the potential to optimize the mean accuracy. We propose the Optimal Order, which finds a step order with a maximal mean accuracy in exponential runtime and the polynomial runtime heuristics Forward Squirrel Order and Backward Squirrel Order, which greedily maximize the accuracy for each additional step taken down and up the trees, respectively. Our evaluation shows, that the Backward Squirrel Order performs $\sim94\%$ as well as the Optimal Order and $\sim99\%$ as well as all other step orders.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Biebert, Christian Hakert, Kay Heider, Daniel Kuhse, Sebastian Buschjäger, Jian-Jia Chen. 2026-03-02. Jump Like A Squirrel: Optimized Execution Step Order for Anytime Random Forest Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01588

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗