SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.07914

Event-Study Designs for Discrete Outcomes with Latent Transition Heterogeneity

Abstract

We develop an identification strategy for average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) in panel data with discrete outcomes. For such outcomes, the parallel trends assumption underlying difference-in-differences (DiD) fails in three distinct ways: mean reversion generates divergent trends when groups differ at baseline, counterfactual probabilities can leave the unit interval, and no single trend is well defined for multi-category outcomes. We replace parallel trends with \textit{transition independence}: absent treatment, transition dynamics conditional on pre-treatment outcomes would be identical between treated and control groups. To accommodate selection on persistent unobserved heterogeneity in transition dynamics, we require transition independence to hold only within latent types. Modeling outcomes as a finite mixture of Markov chains, we identify latent-type and aggregate ATTs from short panels. The framework also yields a flow decomposition of the ATT into inflow and outflow channels. In three empirical applications, our ATT estimates differ substantially from conventional DiD.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Young Ahn, Hiroyuki Kasahara. 2026-03-09. Event-Study Designs for Discrete Outcomes with Latent Transition Heterogeneity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07914

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM