SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.08699

Four negations and the spectral presheaf

Abstract

Using Vakarelov's theory of lattice logics with negation, we introduce the (co)quasiintuitionistic logic, and prove its soundness and completeness with respect to the class of (co)quasiintuitionistic algebras. Combining these algebras together, we obtain biquasiintuitionistic algebras and the biquasiintuitionistic logic. Their further extension with the Skolem algebra structure defines Akchurin algebras and the respective logic, which is a product of biquasiintuitionistic and biintuitionistic logics, featuring four distinct negations. Next we generalise the framework of spectral presheaves (which is a main object in the Butterfield--Isham--D\"{o}ring topos theoretic approach to quantum mechanics) to arbitrary complete orthocomplemented lattices, and show that the orthocomplementation determines two negation operators on the spectral presheaf (one paraconsistent, another paracomplete), equipping the set of all closed-and-open subpresheaves of a spectral presheaf with the structure of a biquasiintuitionistic algebra. Combined with the generic Skolem (i.e. Heyting and Brouwer) algebra structure of this set, this gives a particular instance of an Akchurin algebra. We also show that the underlying orthocomplemented lattice can be reconstructed as an internal object of the spectral presheaf, resulting as the image of a double coquasiintuitionistic (resp., quasiintuitionistic) negation monad (resp., comonad). Finally, we prove a no-go theorem for the claim that the spectral presheaf is a model of a dialectical (or any other) relevance logic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Benjamin Engel, Ryshard-Pavel Kostecki. 2026-03-09. Four negations and the spectral presheaf. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO