arXiv · 2603.11222
Monitoring Limits in DAO Governance: Capacity Breakpoints and Endogenous Concentration
Abstract
Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are designed to disperse control, yet recent evidence shows that effective governance is often concentrated in a small number of participants. This note studies one simple mechanism behind that pattern. Because decentralized governance is monitor-intensive, rising proposal flow may eventually outpace the capacity of broad-based participation. Using a DAO--quarter panel, I estimate a fixed-effects kink model with DAO and quarter fixed effects and find a statistically significant decline in the marginal responsiveness of active voters once proposal activity crosses an interior threshold. I then study realized voting concentration using kink specifications with data-driven cutoffs. Across specifications, decentralization gains do not persist indefinitely once governance workload becomes sufficiently high, and load-based measures show especially clear evidence of a transition toward more concentrated realized control. The results provide reduced-form evidence consistent with a ``too big to monitor'' mechanism in DAO governance: when proposal flow grows faster than broad participation can keep up, effective control may drift toward a smaller set of highly active participants.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Guy Tchuente. 2026-03-11. Monitoring Limits in DAO Governance: Capacity Breakpoints and Endogenous Concentration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11222
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.