SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.11763

Enumerating All Directed Spanning Trees in Optimal Time

Abstract

We consider the problem of enumerating, for a given directed graph $G=(V,E)$ and a node $r\in V$, all directed spanning trees of $G$ rooted at $r$. For undirected graphs, the corresponding problem of enumerating all spanning trees has received considerable attention, culminating in the algorithm of Kapoor and Ramesh [SICOMP 1995] working in $\mathcal{O}(n+m+N)$ time, where $N, n, m$ denote the number of spanning trees, vertices, and edges of $G$, respectively. In the area of enumeration algorithms, this is known as Constant Amortised Time, or CAT. To achieve only constant time per each spanning tree, the algorithm outputs the relative change between the subsequent spanning trees instead of the whole spanning trees themselves. The natural generalization to enumerating all directed spanning trees has been already considered by Gabow and Myers [SICOMP 1978], who provided an $\mathcal{O}(n+m+Nm)$ time algorithm. This time complexity has been improved upon a couple of times, and in 1998 Uno introduced the framework of trimming and balancing that allowed him to obtain an $\mathcal{O}(n+m\log n+N\log^{2}n)$ time algorithm for this problem. By plugging in later results it is immediate to improve the time complexity to $\mathcal{O}(n+m+N\log n)$, but achieving the optimal bound of $\mathcal{O}(n+m+N)$ seems problematic within this framework. In this paper, we show how to enumerate all directed spanning trees in $\mathcal{O}(n+m+N)$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n+m)$ space, matching the time bound for undirected graphs. Our improvement is obtained by designing a purely graph-theoretical characterization of graphs with very few directed spanning trees, and using their structure to speed up the algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paweł Gawrychowski, Marcin Knapik. 2026-03-12. Enumerating All Directed Spanning Trees in Optimal Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11763

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS