Tight (S)ETH-based Lower Bounds for Pseudopolynomial Algorithms for Bin Packing and Multi-Machine Scheduling

Abstract

Bin Packing with $k$ bins is a fundamental optimisation problem in which we are given a set of $n$ integers and a capacity $T$ and the goal is to partition the set into $k$ subsets, each of total sum at most $T$. Bin Packing is NP-hard already for $k=2$ and a textbook dynamic programming algorithm solves it in pseudopolynomial time $\mathcal O(n T^{k-1})$. Jansen, Kratsch, Marx, and Schlotter [JCSS'13] proved that this time cannot be improved to $(nT)^{o(k / \log k)}$ assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Their result has become an important building block, explaining the hardness of many problems in parameterised complexity. Note that their result is one log-factor short of being tight. In this paper, we prove a tight ETH-based lower bound for Bin Packing, ruling out time $2^{o(n)} T^{o(k)}$. This answers an open problem of Jansen et al. and yields improved lower bounds for many applications in parameterised complexity. Since Bin Packing is an example of multi-machine scheduling, it is natural to next study other scheduling problems. We prove tight lower bounds based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) for several classic $k$-machine scheduling problems, including makespan minimisation with release dates ($P_k|r_j|C_{\max}$), minimizing the number of tardy jobs ($P_k||\Sigma U_j$), and minimizing the weighted sum of completion times ($P_k || \Sigma w_j C_j$). For all these problems, we rule out time $2^{o(n)} T^{k-1-\varepsilon}$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ assuming SETH, where $T$ is the total processing time; this matches classic $n^{\mathcal O(1)} T^{k-1}$-time algorithms from the 60s and 70s. Moreover, we rule out time $2^{o(n)} T^{k-\varepsilon}$ for minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs ($P_k||\Sigma p_jU_j$), which matches a classic $\mathcal O(n T^{k})$-time algorithm and answers an open problem of Fischer and Wennmann [TheoretiCS'25].