Machine-Verifying Toom-Cook Multiplication with Integer Evaluation Points

Srihari Nanniyur; Siddhartha Jayanti

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.14038

Machine-Verifying Toom-Cook Multiplication with Integer Evaluation Points

Srihari Nanniyur·Siddhartha Jayanti

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a machine-verified proof of the correctness of Toom-Cook multiplication with generalized integer evaluation points. Toom-Cook is a class of fast multiplication algorithms parameterized by a triple $(k_x, k_y, \vec v)$ consisting of two positive integer split sizes $k_x, k_y$ and a vector $\vec v$ of distinct evaluation points. As part of our proof, we verify that for any selection of $k_x+k_y-1$ distinct integer evaluation points, we can compute a threshold function $\theta(k_x, k_y, \vec v)$ such that, if the algorithm's base-case problem size is set above this threshold, then the algorithm's termination is guaranteed regardless of the values of the operands. The threshold formula, which we derive by obtaining upper bounds on the subproblem sizes produced by the Toom-Cook recurrence, does not depend on the operands; it depends only on $k_x$, $k_y$, $\vec v$, and the base $b$ in which we operate. We write the proof in Lean 4, making use of the Mathlib library. We formalize the algorithm, our base case threshold formula, and our key lemma statements in Lean. We then use the AI theorem prover Aristotle to assist in completing the machine verification of the algorithm's correctness. This proof, through its synthesis of human input and AI assistance, demonstrates the considerable power of AI to automate the machine verification process.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Srihari Nanniyur, Siddhartha Jayanti. 2026-03-14. Machine-Verifying Toom-Cook Multiplication with Integer Evaluation Points. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14038

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗