SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.16956

On the Extension Theorem for Packing Steiner Forests

Abstract

We consider the problem of packing edge-disjoint Steiner forests in a graph. The input consists of a multi-graph $G=(V,E)$ and a collection of $t$ vertex subsets $S = \{S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_t\}$. A Steiner forest for $S$, also called an $S$-forest, is a forest of $G$ in which each $S_i$ is connected. In the case where $t=1$, this is the Steiner Tree packing problem. Kriesell's conjecture postulates that $2k$-edge-connectivity of $S_1$ is sufficient to find $k$ edge-disjoint $S_1$-trees. Lau showed that $24k$-edge-connectivity suffices for the Steiner Tree packing problem, which was improved to $6.5k$ by West and Wu and $5k+4$ by Devos, McDonald and Pivotto. In his thesis, Lau asserts that for the Steiner Forest problem, if each $S_i$ is $30k$-edge-connected in $G$, then there exist $k$ edge-disjoint $S$-forests. However, Lau's proof relies on an intermediate theorem called the Extension Theorem, which in this paper we will demonstrate has a gap by providing a counterexample to Lau's Extension Theorem. Furthermore, we will resolve this gap by correcting Lau's proof to show that $32k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ suffices to pack $k$ $S$-forests. More careful analysis yields that $31k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ is sufficient when $k \geq 8$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jinghan A Zeng. 2026-03-17. On the Extension Theorem for Packing Steiner Forests. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16956

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An FPTAS for Two-Machine Open-Shop Scheduling with a Single Unavailability Interval

We consider the two-machine open-shop scheduling problem in which one machine is unavailable during a fixed interval. We study the resumable setting: an operation interrupted by the unavailability interval may resume, without penalty, when the machine becomes available. The objective is to minimize the makespan. Although the problem is NP-hard and several approximation algorithms are known, whether it admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) has remained open for two decades. We resolve this question affirmatively by giving the first FPTAS, thereby strengthening the previously known polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS). As an intermediate result, we develop a new pseudo-polynomial dynamic program with seven state dimensions, improving on the ten-dimensional formulation in the literature.

cs.DM

Generalized Graph Search Trees

Graph search algorithms and their corresponding graph search trees are commonly used in algorithmic graph theory. In recent years, the recognition problem of these graph search trees has received significant attention. So far, the research has focused on two types of search trees: first-in trees that behave like BFS-trees and last-in trees that behave like DFS-trees. The search tree paradigms differ from each other by the parent a vertex is connected to. In first-in trees, it is the first visited neighbor, while in last-in trees it is the last neighbor visited before that vertex. Here, we will generalize these concepts of graph search trees by allowing every preceding neighbor of a vertex to be the parent. We study the complexity of the recognition problem of these generalized graph search trees. We present NP-completeness proofs for most searches. We also show that the problem is trivial for Generic Search and polynomial-time solvable for several searches on bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. We also study the question how fixing the start vertex influences the complexity of the problem.

cs.DM

The exact asymptotic constant in the metric dimension of Jaccard space

Let $X$ be a finite set with $|X|=n$ and let $\mathrm{Jac}(a,b)=|a\,\triangle\, b|/|a\cup b|$ be the Jaccard distance on the power set $2^X$. Lladser and Paradise recently proved that the metric dimension of $(2^X,\mathrm{Jac})$ is $\Theta(n/\ln n)$, with the constant left open; their bounds are $(\ln 2)\,n/\ln n\lesssim \beta(2^X,\mathrm{Jac})\lesssim 2\ln(2e)\,n/\ln n$. We determine the constant: \[ \beta(2^X,\mathrm{Jac})=\frac{2n}{\log_2 n}\,(1+o(1))=(2\ln 2)\,\frac{n}{\ln n}\,(1+o(1)). \] The proof identifies the problem, on each ``slice'' of subsets of fixed cardinality, with the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi coin-weighing problem for a spring scale (the problem of \emph{detecting matrices}). The lower bound is the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi entropy argument applied to the middle slice; the upper bound follows from the explicit detecting families of Lindstr\"om and of Cantor and Mills, augmented by a single extra landmark that reveals cardinality.

cs.DM