Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.17537

The Inverse Lyndon Array: Definition, Properties, and Linear-Time Construction

Pietro Negri·Manuel Sica·Rocco Zaccagnino·Rosalba Zizza
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Lyndon array stores, at each position of a word, the length of the longest maximal Lyndon subword starting at that position, and plays an important role in combinatorics on words, for example in the construction of fundamental data structures such as the suffix array. In this paper, we introduce the Inverse Lyndon Array, the analogous structure for inverse Lyndon words, namely words that are lexicographically greater than all their proper suffixes. Unlike standard Lyndon words, inverse Lyndon words may have non-trivial borders, which introduces a genuine theoretical difficulty. We show that the inverse Lyndon array can be characterized in terms of the next greater suffix array together with a border-correction term, and prove that this correction coincides with a longest common extension (LCE) value. Building on this characterization, we adapt the nearest-suffix framework underlying Ellert's linear-time construction of the Lyndon array to the inverse setting, obtaining an O(n)-time algorithm for general ordered alphabets. Finally, we discuss implications for suffix comparison and report experiments on random, structured, and real datasets showing that the inverse construction exhibits the same practical linear-time behavior as the standard one.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.FL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pietro Negri, Manuel Sica, Rocco Zaccagnino, Rosalba Zizza. 2026-03-18. The Inverse Lyndon Array: Definition, Properties, and Linear-Time Construction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17537

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗