SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2603.22308

Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers

Abstract

We show that the field of complex numbers $\mathbb C$ contains non-zero infinitesimals by observing that $\mathbb C$ contains non-Archimedean subfields. Our observation is based on an old theorem in algebra due to E. Steinitz, discussed in the article in detail. The presence of infinitesimals in $\mathbb C$ was surprise to the author and might be surprise to the readers as well, since $\mathbb C$ is commonly defined in terms of the field of reals $\mathbb R$, which is Archimedean. An additional intrigue arises from the fact that $\mathbb R$ was historically introduced in 19-th century (by Dedekind, Cauchy and others) exactly to make infinitesimals in Leibniz-Newton infinitesimal calculus redundant. It seems that mathematics will never get rid of infinitesimals completely - they are all around us whether we like it or not. In the last section of the article we explain how our result fits to analysis, both standard and non-standard. With examples from history of calculus as well of first-class recent achievements in analysis we try to convince the reader that presence of infinitesimals in analysis simplifies its formal language and improves its efficiency. The motivations of our research is related to an attempt to simplify the properties of particular algebras of generalized functions of Colombeau's type, shortly discussed in the text.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Todor D. Todorov. 2026-03-18. Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO