arXiv · 2603.24514
Canonical Brackets, (Anti-)BRST Invariant Charges and Physicality Criteria: Non-Abelian 1-Form Gauge Theory
Abstract
In the case of a D-dimensional non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory (without any interaction with the matter fields), we show that the application of the Noether theorem does not lead to the derivations of the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) and anti-BRST charges that obey (i) the (anti-)BRST invariance, and (ii) the nilpotency property (unless we exploit the theoretical strength of $(a)$ the partial integration along with the Gauss divergence theorem, and $(b)$ use the appropriate equations of motion at suitable places). This happens because of the presence of a non-trivial Curci-Ferrari (CF) condition on our BRST-quantized D-dimensional non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory (whose limiting case is the BRST-quantized D-dimensional Abelian 1-form gauge theory where the CF-type restriction is trivial and the corresponding Noether (anti-)BRST charges turn out to be nilpotent as well as (anti-)BRST invariant quantities together). We exploit the theoretical strength of the basic canonical (anti)commutators to prove (i) the Noether (anti-)BRST charges as the true generators for the off-shell nilpotent (anti-)BRST symmetry transformations, and (ii) the (anti-)BRST invariance of the consistently modified versions of the Noether (anti-)BRST charges. We demonstrate that the (anti-)BRST invariant versions of the conserved (anti-)BRST charges are useful in the discussion on the physicality criteria because of their consistency with the Dirac quantization conditions for the gauge theories.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
R. P. Malik. 2026-03-25. Canonical Brackets, (Anti-)BRST Invariant Charges and Physicality Criteria: Non-Abelian 1-Form Gauge Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24514
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.