Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.26247

Conditioning the tanh-drift process on first-passage times: Exact drifts, bridges, and process equivalences

Kacim François-Élie·Alain Mazzolo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this article, we consider the Benes process with drift $\mu(x)=\alpha \tanh(\alpha x + \beta)$, with $\alpha > 0$, $\beta \in \mathbb{R}$, that is, the diffusion defined by the stochastic differential equation $dX(t)=\alpha \tanh(\alpha X(t)+\beta)\,dt + dW(t)$, with an absorbing barrier at $x=a$. After deriving the propagator and key associated quantities--the first-passage-time distribution and the survival probability--we then condition this process to have various prescribed first-passage-time distributions. When the conditioning is imposed at an infinite time horizon, this procedure reveals the existence of different processes that share the same first-passage-time distribution as the Benes process, a phenomenon recently observed in the case of Brownian motion with drift. When the conditioning is imposed at a finite time horizon, the procedure shows that the conditioned Benes process and the Brownian motion with drift under the same conditioning exhibit identical behaviors. This strengthens an elegant result of Benjamini and Lee stating that Brownian motion and the Benes process share the same Brownian bridge, and it also connects with more recent findings obtained by conditioning two independent identical Brownian motions with drift, or two independent Benes processes that annihilate upon meeting. Moreover, we show that several conditioned Benes drifts converge near the absorbing boundary to the drift of the taboo diffusion, i.e., the diffusion conditioned to never reach the absorbing boundary, which motivates a parallel analysis of the taboo process itself. Using Girsanov's theorem, we derive its propagator, first-passage-time distribution, and conditioned versions, thereby further clarifying the structural relationships between Benes, Brownian, and taboo dynamics.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kacim François-Élie, Alain Mazzolo. 2026-03-27. Conditioning the tanh-drift process on first-passage times: Exact drifts, bridges, and process equivalences. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0319005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗