Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.02511

Re-analysis of the Human Transcription Factor Atlas Recovers TF-Specific Signatures from Pooled Single-Cell Screens with Missing Controls

Arka Jain·Umesh Sharma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Public pooled single-cell perturbation atlases are valuable resources for studying transcription factor (TF) function, but downstream re-analysis can be limited by incomplete deposited metadata and missing internal controls. Here we re-analyze the human TF Atlas dataset (GSE216481), a MORF-based pooled overexpression screen spanning 3,550 TF open reading frames and 254,519 cells, with a reproducible pipeline for quality control, MORF barcode demultiplexing, per-TF differential expression, and functional enrichment. From 77,018 cells in the pooled screen, we assign 60,997 (79.2\%) to 87 TF identities. Because the deposited barcode mapping lacks the GFP and mCherry negative controls present in the original library, we use embryoid body (EB) cells as an external baseline and remove shared batch/transduction artifacts by background subtraction. This strategy recovers TF-specific signatures for 59 of 61 testable TFs, compared with 27 detected by one-vs-rest alone, showing that robust TF-level signal can be rescued despite missing intra-pool controls. HOPX, MAZ, PAX6, FOS, and FEZF2 emerge as the strongest transcriptional remodelers, while per-TF enrichment links FEZF2 to regulation of differentiation, EGR1 to Hippo and cardiac programs, FOS to focal adhesion, and NFIC to collagen biosynthesis. Condition-level analyses reveal convergent Wnt, neurogenic, EMT, and Hippo signatures, and Harmony indicates minimal confounding batch effects across pooled replicates. Our per-TF effect sizes significantly agree with Joung et al.'s published rankings (Spearman $\rho = -0.316$, $p = 0.013$; negative because lower rank indicates stronger effect). Together, these results show that the deposited TF Atlas data can support validated TF-specific transcriptional and pathway analyses when paired with principled external controls, artifact removal, and reproducible computation.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGq-bio.GNq-bio.MN

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arka Jain, Umesh Sharma. 2026-04-02. Re-analysis of the Human Transcription Factor Atlas Recovers TF-Specific Signatures from Pooled Single-Cell Screens with Missing Controls. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02511

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗