Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.05499

MARS-Dragonfly: Agile and Robust Flight Control of Modular Aerial Robot Systems

Rui Huang·Zhiqian Cai·Siyu Tang·Pengxuan Wei·Lidong Li·Xin Chen·Wenhan Cao·Zhenyu Zhang·Lin Zhao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modular Aerial Robot Systems (MARS) comprise multiple drone units with reconfigurable connected formations, providing high adaptability to diverse mission scenarios, fault conditions, and payload capacities. However, existing control algorithms for MARS rely on simplified quasi-static models and rule-based allocation, which generate discontinuous and unbounded motor commands. This leads to attitude error accumulation as the number of drone units scales, ultimately causing severe oscillations during docking, separation, and waypoint tracking. To address these limitations, we first design a compact mechanical system that enables passive docking, detection-free passive locking, and magnetic-assisted separation using a single micro servo. Second, we introduce a force-torque-equivalent and polytope-constraint virtual quadrotor that explicitly models feasible wrench sets. Together, these abstractions capture the full MARS dynamics and enable existing quadrotor controllers to be applied across different configurations. We further optimize the yaw angle that maximizes control authority to enhance agility. Third, building on this abstraction, we design a two-stage predictive-allocation pipeline: a constrained predictive tracker computes virtual inputs while respecting force/torque bounds, and a dynamic allocator maps these inputs to individual modules with balanced objectives to produce smooth, trackable motor commands. Simulations across over 10 configurations and real-world experiments demonstrate stable docking, locking, and separation, as well as effective control performance. To our knowledge, this is the first real-world demonstration of MARS achieving agile flight and transport with 40 deg peak pitch while maintaining an average position error of 0.0896 m. The video is available at: https://youtu.be/yqjccrIpz5o

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rui Huang, Zhiqian Cai, Siyu Tang, Pengxuan Wei, Lidong Li, Xin Chen, Wenhan Cao, Zhenyu Zhang, Lin Zhao. 2026-04-07. MARS-Dragonfly: Agile and Robust Flight Control of Modular Aerial Robot Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05499

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗