arXiv · 2604.07406
On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Nondeterministic Complexity and Related Classes
Abstract
The definition of \NP\ requires, for each member language~$L$, a polynomial-time checking relation~$R$ and a constant~$k$ such that $w \in L \iff \exists y\,(|y| \leq |w|^k \wedge R(w,y))$. We show that this biconditional instantiates, for each member language, Hilbert's triple: a sound, complete, decidable proof system in which truth-in-$L$ and bounded provability coincide by fiat. We show further that the polynomial-time restriction on~$R$ does not exclude G\"odel's proof-checking relation, which is itself polynomial-time and fits the definition as a literal instance. Hence \NP, taken as a totality over all polynomial-time~$R$, contains languages for which the biconditional asserts a property that G\"odel's First Incompleteness Theorem prohibits. The semantic definition of \NP\ is unsatisfiable, for the same reason that Hilbert's Program is.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Martin Kolář. 2026-04-08. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Nondeterministic Complexity and Related Classes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07406
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.