SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.08098

AnOldBabylonian coefficient, its origin and impact on our understanding of measures on circles, including the radian measure

Abstract

This study reconstructs the origin of a constant, here called $\Xi$ (Xi), as a primary scaling factor in Old Babylonian mathematics and astronomy. $\Xi$ arises from the practical necessity of precise measurements on the sky or a circle, through the harmonization of length-measure systems. The analysis of the Nippur measure (with its famous cubit) and the Gudea measure shows that $\Xi = 375/360$ represents the ratio of these established Old Babylonian measure systems. As a precision factor for circumference calculations, it remained in use until today. In Ptolemy's work, we find a slightly refined value of $\Xi = 377/360$. A further refinement of this coefficient led to our modern $\pi$, which still incorporates the two Old Babylonian components of a demonstrably two-stage calculation and refinement process. The accuracy increased by only 0.5\% compared to the first ratio. This factor, attested on several Old Babylonian cuneiform tablets including those from Susa, demonstrates the profound understanding of sexagesimal logic. The relative sexagesimal notation (60 = 1 = 1/60) enabled the universal application of $\Xi$ and its reciprocal for highly accurate calculations of arc-length on circular segments. This investigation leads ultimately to a surprising consequence: the modern radian measure is a direct descendant of this Old Babylonian coefficient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jens Kleb. 2026-04-09. AnOldBabylonian coefficient, its origin and impact on our understanding of measures on circles, including the radian measure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08098

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO