arXiv · 2604.09823
Agentic Workflows for Resolving Conflict Over Shared Resources: A Power Grid Application
Abstract
The increasing use of LLM-based agents to support decision-making and control across diverse domains motivates the need for systematic deconfliction of their proposed actions. We present a deconfliction framework for coordinating multiple agents that formally encapsulate individual applications, each proposing potentially conflicting actions over shared resources. Conflicts are resolved through three deconfliction modes: bilateral negotiation, structured mediation, and procedural (deterministic) deconfliction. We define design principles for large language model-based client agents, including a chain-of-thought style reasoning process, and introduce an iterative weighted-consensus mechanism that does not require the applications themselves to solve optimization problems. The framework is domain agnostic and supports both numeric and non-numeric decisions. Its performance is demonstrated on a power distribution use case with conflicting advanced distribution management system applications for cost optimization and resilience, coordinating diesel generators and battery energy storage systems.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Shiva Poudel, Thiagarajan Ramachandran, Orestis Vasios, Andrew P. Reiman. 2026-04-10. Agentic Workflows for Resolving Conflict Over Shared Resources: A Power Grid Application. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09823
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.