SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.12798

VFA: Relieving Vector Operations in Flash Attention with Global Maximum Pre-computation

Abstract

FlashAttention-style online softmax enables exact attention computation with linear memory by streaming score tiles through on-chip memory and maintaining a running maximum and normalizer. However, as attention kernels approach peak tensor-core/cube-core throughput on modern accelerators, non-matmul components of online softmax -- especially per-tile rowmax and rowsum reductions and rescale chains -- can become vector or SIMD limited and dominate latency. This paper revisits FlashAttention and proposes Vector Relieved Flash Attention (VFA), a hardware-friendly method that reduces rowmax-driven updates of the running maximum while retaining the online-softmax structure. VFA initializes the running maximum via a cheap approximation from key-block representations, reorders key-block traversal to prioritize high-impact sink and local blocks, and freezes the maximum for remaining blocks to avoid repeated reductions and rescaling. We further integrate VFA with block-sparse skipping methods such as BLASST to form Vector Relieved Sparse Attention (VSA), which reduces both block count and per-block overhead. Notably, VFA and VSA completely avoid the conditional rescale operation in the update stage used in FA4.0. Extensive evaluations on benchmarks including MMLU and MATH500, together with attention statistics, verify our design: (i) sink and local reordering stabilizes the running maximum early; (ii) simple Q and K block summaries fail due to intra-block heterogeneity; (iii) m-initialization is required when maxima appear in middle blocks. Overall, VFA and VSA efficiently alleviate online-softmax reduction bottlenecks without performance loss. Compared to the C16V32 baseline, C8V32, C4V32 and C4V16 achieve nearly two times speedup on modern hardware while hitting the vector bottleneck. With upcoming architecture improvements, C4V16 will deliver six times speedup by enhancing exponent capacity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yupeng Sun, Yanzhao Li, Zhiqiang Zou, Bai Du, Zhiyuan Zhang, Hui Dong, Gaoyige Fan, Hui Wang. 2026-04-14. VFA: Relieving Vector Operations in Flash Attention with Global Maximum Pre-computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12798

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG