SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.13526

Linear-Time Exact Computation of Influence Spread on Bounded-Pathwidth Graphs

Abstract

Given a network and a set of vertices called seeds to initially inject information, influence spread is the expected number of vertices that eventually receive the information under a certain stochastic model of information propagation. Under the commonly used independent cascade model, influence spread is equivalent to the expected number of vertices reachable from the seeds on a directed uncertain graph, and the exact evaluation of influence spread offers many applications, e.g., influence maximization. Although its evaluation is a \#P-hard task, there is an algorithm that can precisely compute the influence spread in $O(mn\omega_p^2\cdot 2^{\omega_p^2})$ time, where $\omega_p$ is the pathwidth of the graph. We improve this by developing an algorithm that computes the influence spread in $O((m+n)\omega_p^2\cdot 2^{\omega_p^2})$ time. This is achieved by identifying the similarities in the repetitive computations in the existing algorithm and sharing them to reduce computation. Although similar refinements have been considered for the probability computation on undirected uncertain graphs, a greater number of similarities must be leveraged for directed graphs to achieve linear time complexity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kengo Nakamura, Masaaki Nishino. 2026-04-15. Linear-Time Exact Computation of Influence Spread on Bounded-Pathwidth Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13526

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS