Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.14633

Balancing Weights, Directed Sparsification, and Augmenting Paths

Jason Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a randomized augmenting paths-based algorithm to compute the maximum flow in a directed, uncapacitated graph in almost $m+nF$ time, matching the algorithm of Karger and Levine for undirected graphs (SICOMP 2015). Combined with an initial $\sqrt n$ rounds of blocking flow to reduce the value of $F$, we obtain a maximum flow algorithm with running time $mn^{1/2+o(1)}$. For combinatorial, augmenting paths-based algorithms, this is the first improvement over Dinic's algorithm for moderately sparse graphs. To obtain our algorithm, we introduce a new technique to re-weight the edges of a strongly connected directed graph so that each cut is approximately balanced: the total weight of edges in one direction is within a constant factor of the total weight in the other direction. We then adapt Karger and Levine's technique of sampling edges from the newly weighted residual graph, ensuring that an augmenting path exists in the sampled graph with high probability. One technical difficulty is that our balancing weights have to be dynamically maintained upon changes to the residual graph. Surprisingly, we can black box the dynamic data structure from the recent interior point method-based flow algorithm of van den Brand et al. (FOCS 2024).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jason Li. 2026-04-16. Balancing Weights, Directed Sparsification, and Augmenting Paths. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14633

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗