Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.17064

Sarus Suite: Cloud-native Containers for HPC

Alberto Madonna·Matteo Chesi·Gwangmu Lee·Michele Brambilla·Fawzi Roberto Mohamed·Felipe A. Cruz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

High-performance computing (HPC) systems must support fast-moving software stacks, especially in AI/ML, while preserving scheduler control, scalable startup, and production performance. Yet many HPC container solutions rely on specialized runtime stacks that weaken continuity with mainstream cloud-native workflows and require ongoing effort to sustain compatibility with the evolving upstream ecosystem. We argue that HPC should specialize the integration layer while keeping the container engine aligned with upstream container evolution. We present Sarus Suite, an upstream-aligned HPC container architecture built around an unchanged Podman engine. Sarus Suite adds the HPC-specific functionality needed for production use through complementary system layers for declarative runtime specification, scheduler-native execution, scalable shared-image access, and standards-based host capability injection. We evaluate Sarus Suite on a Cray EX GH200 system using communication-intensive HPC workloads, large scale AI training, metadata-heavy startup workloads, and container startup measurements. Across PyFR, SPH-EXA, Megatron-LM, and Pynamic, Sarus Suite matches the performance and scaling of the production Enroot+Pyxis baseline while delivering consistently faster per-node container startup. The architecture also enables direct use of upstream OCI images, including NGC-based images, and supports cloud-native multi-container workflows expressed through Kubernetes manifests. These results show that HPC-grade containers do not require an HPC-specific runtime, provided that scheduler semantics, scalable image access, and host integration are implemented in explicit system layers. This preserves upstream continuity and software agility while maintaining scheduler control, scalability, and production performance.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alberto Madonna, Matteo Chesi, Gwangmu Lee, Michele Brambilla, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Felipe A. Cruz. 2026-04-18. Sarus Suite: Cloud-native Containers for HPC. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗