Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.17668

Original Sin of npm: A Study on Vulnerability Propagation in JavaScript Dependency Networks

Michael Robinson·Sajal Halder·Muhammad Ejaz Ahmed·Muhammad Ikram·Seyit Camtepe·Hyoungshick Kim
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding vulnerability propagation is essential for assessing how vulnerabilities spread across components of a software package. This supports more accurate impact analysis and enhances threat detection and mitigation. In this paper, we investigate how a small number of vulnerable JavaScript packages contribute to the creation of a disproportionately large number of vulnerable packages. This paper presents insights from 1,515 reported vulnerabilities gathered from a custom-built vulnerability database containing 1,077,946 JavaScript packages sourced from `npm-follower' and their associated dependency networks. Dependency networks were constructed using the deps.dev API, with vulnerabilities identified by parsing package names and version numbers through the Google Open Source Vulnerability API. Our findings reveal that 61.30% (660,748) of packages are reliant on one or more dependency packages, and 21.60% (232,836) of total packages have at least one known vulnerability throughout their dependency networks -- of which most (42%) are of High severity. We also found that it takes, on average, approximately 4 years and 11 months to fix a vulnerable package from when the first vulnerable version is published on npm -- although publication times of vulnerabilities occur approximately 19 days after a fix is available. Finally, we observe a high concentration of frequently present vulnerabilities throughout dependency networks, with the top-7 most frequent vulnerabilities accounting for 25% of vulnerability cases and the top-23 most frequent accounting for 50%. Based on these findings, we propose recommendations for developers and package managers to mitigate the threat and occurrence of vulnerabilities within the npm dependency network and the broader software repository community.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Robinson, Sajal Halder, Muhammad Ejaz Ahmed, Muhammad Ikram, Seyit Camtepe, Hyoungshick Kim. 2026-04-19. Original Sin of npm: A Study on Vulnerability Propagation in JavaScript Dependency Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17668

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗