SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.18090

Muscle-inspired magnetic actuators that push, pull, crawl, and grasp

Abstract

Functional magnetic composites capable of large deformation, load bearing, and multifunctional motion are essential for next-generation adaptive soft robots. Here, we present muscle-inspired magnetic actuators (MMA), additively manufactured from a thermoplastic/permanent magnet polyurethane/Nd2Fe14B (TPU/MQP-S) composite using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). By tuning the laser-energy scale between 1.0 and 3.0, both mechanical stiffness and magnetic response are precisely controlled: the tensile strength increases from 0.28 to 0.99 MPa while maintaining 30-45% elongation at break. This process enables the creation of 0.5 mm-thick flexural hinges, which reversibly bend and fold under moderate magnetic fields without damage. Two actuator types are reported showing the system versatility. The elongated actuator with self-weight of 1.57 g, magnetized in its contracted state, achieves linear contraction under a 500 mT field, lifting 50 g (32x its own weight) and sustaining performance over at least 50 cycles. Equipped with anisotropic frictional feet, it supports movement of a magnetic crawling robot that achieves up to 100% locomotion success on textured substrates. The expandable actuator exhibits reversible opening and closing under a 300 mT field, reliably grasping and releasing different objects, including soft berries and rigid 3D printed geometries. It can also anchor in a tube while holding suspended 50 g loads. This work demonstrates a LPBF-based strategy to program both stiffness and magnetization within a single material system, enabling remotely driven, reconfigurable, and fatigue-resistant soft actuators. The approach opens new possibilities for force controlled, multifunctional magnetic soft robots for adaptive gripping, locomotion, and minimally invasive manipulation of biomedical tools.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Muhammad Bilal Khan, Florian Hofmann, Kilian Schäfer, Matthias Lutzi, Oliver Gutfleisch. 2026-04-20. Muscle-inspired magnetic actuators that push, pull, crawl, and grasp. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x%2Fae8cc7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO