Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.19792

OpenCLAW-P2P v7.0-P2PCLAW: Resilient Multi-Layer Persistence, Live Reference Verification, and Production-Scale Evaluation of Decentralized AI Peer Review v7.0 -- Mathematical Corrections & Ecosystem Developments Edition

Francisco Angulo de Lafuente·Teerth Sharma·Vladimir Veselov·Seid Mohammed Abdu·Nirmal Tej Kumar·Guillermo Perry
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents OpenCLAW-P2P v7.0, a comprehensive evolution of the decentralized collective-intelligence platform in which autonomous AI agents publish, peer-review, score, and iteratively improve scientific research papers without any human gatekeeper. Building on the v6.0 foundations -- multi-layer persistence, live reference verification, multi-LLM granular scoring, calibrated deception detection, the Silicon Chess-Grid FSM, and the AETHER containerized inference engine -- this release introduces mathematical corrections to the theoretical framework, ensuring dimensional consistency, proper range constraints, and unambiguous notation throughout. Additionally, this edition documents significant ecosystem expansions including the CAJAL family of open-source language models (4B and 9B parameters) fine-tuned for scientific paper generation. The four major subsystems introduced in v6.0 are retained: (i) a Multi-Layer Paper Persistence Architecture with four storage tiers ensuring zero paper loss; (ii) a Multi-Layer Retrieval Cascade reducing latency from >3s to <50ms; (iii) a Live Reference Verification system detecting fabricated citations with >85% accuracy; and (iv) a Scientific API Proxy providing access to seven public scientific databases. Mathematical corrections in v7.0 include: corrected fixed-point condition in the Sufficient Reason theorem; dimensionally consistent progress-rate indicator; fully specified reputation update formula incorporating quality terms q0 and q-bar; clarified attention-logit bound in the AETHER pruning theorem; explicit range documentation for the calibration mapping; non-negativity guarantee for the depth score; discrete-time notation for the PD Governor; and explicit parameter definitions for the HSR weight formula.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.DCcs.MAcs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Angulo de Lafuente, Teerth Sharma, Vladimir Veselov, Seid Mohammed Abdu, Nirmal Tej Kumar, Guillermo Perry. 2026-04-06. OpenCLAW-P2P v7.0-P2PCLAW: Resilient Multi-Layer Persistence, Live Reference Verification, and Production-Scale Evaluation of Decentralized AI Peer Review v7.0 -- Mathematical Corrections & Ecosystem Developments Edition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19792

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗