SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.22610

How GenAI is Helping Reimagine Antenatal Care in A Low-Resource Setting: From Provider Enablement to Patient Empowerment

Abstract

Despite steady global advances, maternal mortality remains alarmingly high in Pakistan (155 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2023); largely as a consequence of fragmented paper records, low literacy, poor access to quality healthcare, and gendered barriers that compromise care continuity. Over three years, we designed, deployed, and iteratively developed Awaaz-e-Sehat, a speech-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that generates electronic medical records (EMRs) and supports decision-making in maternal health. The tool evolved from a clinician-facing AI assistant that automated Urdu speech-to-EMR generation into a patient-centred WhatsApp-based platform, enabling women to generate their own structured clinical notes, receive AI-generated antenatal guidance, and share QR-coded records with providers anywhere in the country. This case study documents that translational journey, i.e., how the ground realities of workload, linguistic nuance, and infrastructural constraints reshaped our design. The result is not merely a new method of record-keeping, but a reimagining of antenatal care and electronic medical records themselves. In settings where clinicians are time-constrained and have little institutional incentive to document, Awaaz-e-Sehat proposes a model of care that centres patients as active participants in generating and owning their health data. By keeping patients informed about their own risk factors and integrating them into the clinical decision-support loop, the system transforms EMRs and CDSS from static institutional artefacts into dynamic tools for self-advocacy and shared accountability in maternal health.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maryam Mustafa, Imaan Hameed, Amna Shahnawaz, Bilal A Mateen. 2026-04-24. How GenAI is Helping Reimagine Antenatal Care in A Low-Resource Setting: From Provider Enablement to Patient Empowerment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22610

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC