SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2604.25667

Two Efficient Message-passing Exclusive Scan Algorithms

Abstract

Parallel scan primitives compute element-wise inclusive or exclusive prefix sums of input vectors contributed by $p$ consecutively ranked processors under an associative, possibly expensive, binary operator $\oplus$. In message-passing systems with bounded, one-ported communication capabilities, at least $\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ or $\lceil\log_2 (p-1)\rceil$ send-receive communication rounds are required to perform the scans. While there are well-known, simple algorithms for the inclusive scan that solve the problem in $\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ send-receive communication rounds with $\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ applications of the $\oplus$ operator, the exclusive scan is different and has been much less addressed. By considering natural invariants for the exclusive prefix sums problem, we present two different algorithms that are efficient in the number of communication rounds and in the number of applications of the $\oplus$ operator. The first algorithm consists of an inclusive scan phase and an exclusive scan phase and trades the number of communication rounds against the number of applications of the $\oplus$ operator. The smallest number of inclusive scan rounds with $q=\lceil\log_2 p\rceil$ rounds in total is $q'\geq q-\log_2(2^q-p+1)$. The other algorithm is a modification of a round-optimal all-reduce algorithm, and the number of additional applications of the $\oplus$ operator is dependent on the number of bits set (popcount of) in $p-1$. Both algorithms are relevant for small(er) input vectors where performance is dominated by the number of communication rounds. For large input vectors, other (pipelined, fixed-degree tree) algorithms must be used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jesper Larsson Träff. 2026-04-28. Two Efficient Message-passing Exclusive Scan Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25667

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS