Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.25790

Mixed-dimensional quantum MacWilliams identity: Bounds for codes and absolutely maximally entangled states in heterogeneous systems

David González-Lociga·Simeon Ball
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As emerging quantum architectures evolve into heterogeneous networks combining different physical substrates, such as qubits for logic and higher-dimensional qudits for robust communication, the traditional scalar metrics of quantum error correction become insufficient. To address this, we introduce a mathematical framework based on dimension multisets to characterize quantum error-correcting codes (QECC) and absolutely maximally entangled (AME) states in mixed-dimensional Hilbert spaces. By replacing scalar weights with multisets, we accurately capture the exact physical composition of error supports across these diverse systems. Our central result is the mixed-dimensional quantum MacWilliams identity, which establishes the formal algebraic relationship between Shor-Laflamme enumerators and unitary weight enumerators. From this foundation, we deduce the mixed-dimensional shadow identity and derive rigorous, generalized constraints on code parameters, explicitly formulating the mixed-dimensional quantum Hamming, Singleton and Scott bounds, and developing a linear program to systematically evaluate code viability. For the Singleton bound, a tighter bound that has no homogeneous analogue is derived for pure mixed-dimensional codes. Finally, we deploy this enumerator machinery to thoroughly analyze AME states, utilizing shadow inequalities to constrain their existence and introducing a combinatorial grid method for the explicit construction of mixed-dimensional tripartite AME states.

Explore related subjects

quant-phcs.ITmath.COmath.IT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David González-Lociga, Simeon Ball. 2026-09-01. Mixed-dimensional quantum MacWilliams identity: Bounds for codes and absolutely maximally entangled states in heterogeneous systems. https://doi.org/10.1103/fyq2-mpmm

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.IT subjectmath.CO subjectmath.IT subjectquant-ph subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Comments on the recent improvements of the MRRW bounds

The asymptotic McEliece--Rodemich--Rumsey--Welch bound (1977) limits the largest attainable rate of binary codes as a function of the relative distance. After a nearly half-century hiatus, this result was recently improved in two concurrent works, by OpenAI and by O. Alrabiah and V. Guruswami. The two arguments look entirely different, a Delsarte certificate on the one hand, a classical-quantum channel and the pretty good measurement on the other, and they yield the same bound. The purpose of this note is to explain why: in both proofs, a subspace is attached to every codeword and moved with it, and the bound counts how many such subspaces fit in the ambient space, exactly in the first case and in the probabilistic sense of typicality in the second. We also present the OpenAI proof in the language and context of coding theory, as an extension of the spectral method in which the single vector attached to a codeword is replaced by a subspace.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

Traveling Salesman Problem with a preprocessing method for classical and quantum optimization

The Traveling Salesman Problem is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem widely studied in operations research. Despite its simple formulation, it remains computationally challenging due to the exponential growth of the search space and the large number of constraints required to eliminate subtours. This paper introduces a preprocessing strategy that significantly reduces the size of the optimization model by restricting the set of candidate arcs and retaining only the lowest-cost neighbors for each vertex. Computational experiments on TSPLIB benchmark instances demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially reduces the number of decision variables. The method is evaluated using both classical and quantum optimization techniques, showing improvements in computational time and reductions in optimality gaps. Overall, the results indicate that the proposed preprocessing enhances the scalability of the formulations and makes them more suitable for both classical solvers and emerging quantum optimization frameworks.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Accelerating Fourier--Motzkin elimination: redundancy removal and the choice of variable elimination order

Fourier-Motzkin elimination computes an inequality description of the projection of a polyhedron onto a subset of its coordinates by eliminating one variable at a time. It is used in several areas of optimisation and computer science, and it is a standard way of obtaining the entropic constraints of a causal structure, where the marginalisation over the latent variables produces such a projection. Its limitation is the growth of the intermediate systems of inequalities, which can be doubly exponential in the number of eliminated variables even though the projection itself grows only as a single exponential. In practice the computational overload of the method therefore depends on two choices: how the redundant inequalities are removed after each step, and the order in which the variables are eliminated. We consider both. We first show, by an explicit example, that Imbert's redundancy test cannot be interleaved with redundancy removal by linear programming. We show that the two methods, however, can be combined soundly if the derivation records used by Imbert's test are re-initialised after every step at which linear programming is used. We then propose a rule for choosing the elimination order of the variables that gives a significant computational advantage, however, at the cost of increased resource usage. We demonstrate this advantage on some random polytopes, where the rule reduces the running time by factors of between 6 and 25 compared with the same elimination under a fixed order. For entropic descriptions of causal structures, with more than 250 inequalities and more than 100 variables to eliminate, our rule keeps the number of inequalities handled at each step one to two orders of magnitude lower than a fixed order.

cs.CC↗