arXiv · 2604.26977
Defeasible Conditional Obligation in a Two-tiered Preference-based Semantics (Extended Version)
Abstract
In response to a concern raised by Horty, this paper develops a two-tiered, preference-based semantic framework for modeling defeasible conditional obligations. The paper extends a Hansson-Lewis style preference semantics for dyadic deontic logic by incorporating a nonmonotonic reasoning mechanism that enables previously derived obligations to be withdrawn when new, potentially conflicting information comes in. The account is bi-preferential: two orderings--ideality and normality--on worlds are employed to address shortcomings in earlier approaches, with a separate ranking method for each. At the nonmonotonic layer, a number of postulates are considered, including antecedent strengthening, inclusion and no-drowning. A connection is established with so-called constrained input/output (I/O) logic--an existing standard for normative reasoning based on a different methodology.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Xavier Parent. 2026-04-28. Defeasible Conditional Obligation in a Two-tiered Preference-based Semantics (Extended Version). https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26977
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.