Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.27972

From LLM-Driven Trading Card Generation to Procedural Relatedness: A Pok\'emon Case Study

Johannes Pfau·Panagiotis Vrettis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since the dawn of Trading Card Games, the genre has grown into a multi-billion-dollar industry engaging millions of analog and digital players worldwide. Popular TCGs rely on regular updates, balance adjustments, and rotating constraints to sustain engagement. Yet, as metagames stabilize, predictable strategies dominate and viable card options diminish, often resulting in repetitive and impaired player experiences. This paper investigates the use of Large Language Models and Image Diffusion Models for Procedural Content Generation of TCG cards, addressing these challenges by enabling a personalized infinity of card designs. Modern generative AI not only enables large-scale content creation but could even introduce procedural relatedness, fostering unique connections between players and their cards. We present a pipeline combining player-centric co-creation, fine-tuned embeddings, local LLMs, and Diffusion Models to generate dynamic, personalized cards while potentially expanding creative range. We evaluated the pipeline in a user study with 49 participants who generated 196 Pok\'emon card samples. Participants rated aesthetics and representativeness of visuals and mechanics, and provided qualitative feedback. Results show high satisfaction and indicate that most participants successfully realized their own ideas through prompt adjustments. These findings lay groundwork for future content generation systems and alternatives to conventional metagame evolution through procedural relatedness.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.HC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Pfau, Panagiotis Vrettis. 2026-04-30. From LLM-Driven Trading Card Generation to Procedural Relatedness: A Pok\'emon Case Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27972

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗