SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.00779

Evaluating the performance of GCM trajectories using Weather Type frequencies for persistence and transitions: the Iberian Peninsula and Lamb classification

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of 36 historical CMIP6 GCM trajectories (1979-2005) in reproducing atmospheric circulation over the Iberian Peninsula in the summer months (June-September) using the Lamb Weather Type (WT) classification scheme. Using ERA5 reanalysis as the observational reference, we introduce a methodological framework-applicable to any region worldwide-to evaluate GCM performance. This approach extends traditional daily frequency analysis by evaluating both the daily frequency distribution of WTs and their 24-hour dynamic evolution (i.e., transition probabilities and persistence). Model performance is quantified using the Overlap coefficient. A filtering process is applied where only trajectories that successfully reproduce both daily and conditional distributions with a minimum Overlap threshold $t_{sim}$ across a set number of grid points are retained. The findings show that while several models can adequately reproduce daily WT frequencies (16 out of 36), some struggle to capture day-to-day atmospheric transitions. This leads to a final selection of 12 trajectories over the Iberian Peninsula. Model performance across the region is then evaluated using integrated metrics assessing daily reproduction, conditional reproduction, and transition dynamics. Overall, models from the ec earth3 family-specifically the ec earth3 aerchem trajectory-exhibit the best and most consistent performance across the region. Additionally, the results highlight a geographical performance gap: while models generally represent circulation well in the northwest, they face significant challenges in the central and southern Mediterranean regions of the Peninsula. Ultimately, this study establishes that assessing WT persistence and transitions provides a far more discriminative, objective tool for GCM selection than evaluating daily distributions alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elsa Barrio-Torres, Swen Brands, Jesús Asín, Jesús Abaurrea, Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca, Jorge Castillo-Mateo. 2026-05-01. Evaluating the performance of GCM trajectories using Weather Type frequencies for persistence and transitions: the Iberian Peninsula and Lamb classification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00779

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME