SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.02387

On the power of standard DFS and BFS

Abstract

It is well-known since the seventies of last century that Depth First Search (DFS) can be used to compute strongly connected components [RE. Tarjan. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1972] and Breadth First Search (BFS) can be used to compute distance in graphs [GY. Handler. Transportation Science, 1973]. We furthermore demonstrate that these standard graph searches are powerful enough to recognize and certify several well-structured graph classes. Specifically, we provide a single DFS approach for recognizing and certifying trivially perfect graphs that is significantly simpler than previous methods using [FPM. Chu. Information Processing Letters, 2008]. We further show that a single BFS can recognize split graphs and bipartite chain graphs, and we improve upon the triple LexBFS algorithm for proper interval graphs [DG. Corneil. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2004] by proposing a two consecutive BFS recognition scheme. These results are underpinned by characterizations using vertex orderings that avoid specific patterns [L. Feuilloley, M. Habib. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2021]. Finally, we provide a structural study of connected proper interval graphs, proving that their characterizations via special orderings are unique up to reversal and the permutation of true twins.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Binh-Minh Bui-Xuan, Michel Habib, Fabien de Montgolfier, Renaud Torfs. 2026-05-04. On the power of standard DFS and BFS. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02387

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS