Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.02525

A Semantic Autonomy Framework for VLM-Integrated Indoor Mobile Robots: Hybrid Deterministic Reasoning and Cross-Robot Adaptive Memory

Bogdan Felician Abaza·Andrei-Alexandru Staicu·Cristian Vasile Doicin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Autonomous indoor mobile robots can navigate reliably to metric coordinates using established frameworks such as ROS 2 Navigation 2, yet they lack the ability to interpret natural language instructions that express intent rather than positions. Vision-Language Models offer the semantic reasoning required to bridge this gap, but their inference latency (2-9 seconds per decision on consumer hardware) and session-by-session amnesia limit practical deployment. This paper presents the Semantic Autonomy Stack, a six-layer reference framework for semantically autonomous indoor navigation, and validates a complete instance featuring hybrid deterministic-VLM reasoning and cross-robot adaptive memory on physical robots with off-the-shelf edge hardware. A seven-step parametric resolver handles 88% of instructions in under 0.1 milliseconds without invoking a language model, camera, or GPU; only genuinely ambiguous instructions escalate to VLM reasoning. A five-category semantic memory framework with explicit scope taxonomy (global environment knowledge, per-operator preferences, per-robot capabilities) enables cross-session learning and cross-robot knowledge transfer: preferences learned through VLM interactions on one robot are promoted to deterministic resolution and transferred to a second robot via a shared compiled digest, achieving a measured latency reduction of 103,000-fold. Experimental validation on two custom-built differential-drive robots across 82 scenario-level decisions and three sessions demonstrates 100% semantic transfer accuracy (33/33, 95% CI [0.894, 1.000]), 100% semantic resolution accuracy, and concurrent multi-robot operation feasibility - all on Raspberry Pi 5 platforms with no onboard GPU, requiring zero training data.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bogdan Felician Abaza, Andrei-Alexandru Staicu, Cristian Vasile Doicin. 2026-05-04. A Semantic Autonomy Framework for VLM-Integrated Indoor Mobile Robots: Hybrid Deterministic Reasoning and Cross-Robot Adaptive Memory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02525

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗