SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.02636

Convolutional Neural Networks in Vis-NIR Chemometrics: From Contradiction to Conditional Design

Abstract

Near-infrared (NIR and Vis-NIR) spectroscopy is widely used for rapid, non-destructive analysis in food, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, process analytical technology, and bioprocess monitoring. Nevertheless, deep-learning studies in NIR chemometrics often reach conflicting conclusions about convolutional neural network (CNN) design, including kernel size, depth, preprocessing, model complexity, and transfer robustness. This review argues that many apparent contradictions reflect incomplete experimental conditioning rather than incompatible findings. CNN performance depends on interactions among spectral physics, dataset regime, acquisition protocol, validation design, and deployment conditions. We organize the literature around three moderators. First, NIR signals are indirect, highly collinear, and shaped by broad overlapping bands, scattering, temperature, and matrix effects. Second, CNN design should be interpreted through receptive-field reasoning: kernel size, depth, dilation, and multi-scale branches determine the wavelength span available to the model, whereas the effective receptive field indicates which parts are actually used. Third, validation design can behave as a hidden hyperparameter because random splits may reward architectures that exploit shared batch, instrument, season, or process-run structure instead of transferable chemical information. We therefore propose a conditional design framework in which preprocessing, architecture, hyperparameter optimization, transfer evaluation, interpretability, and reproducibility are treated as coupled components. Rather than seeking a universally optimal CNN, the framework aims to support physics-aware, shift-aware, and reproducible model comparison in NIR chemometrics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dário Passos. 2026-05-04. Convolutional Neural Networks in Vis-NIR Chemometrics: From Contradiction to Conditional Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2026.119015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG