SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.03516

Spherical trigonometry before the modern era:The treatise of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi

Abstract

This is an overview of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi's Treatise of the quadrilateral, an invaluable 13th century document on spherical geometry which was translated into French in 1891. The title we are using here is the one given by the translator (Alexandre Carath{\'e}odory). A title which is closer to the original Arabic is ''Disclosing the secrets of the secant figure.'' The term ''secant figure'', to which the title refers, is the so-called ''complete (spherical) quadrilateral'', that is, the figure that underlies what we call today Menelaus' Theorem. This theorem gives a formula that was extensively used by astronomers in their computations and the establishment of their tables since the first century AD, notably by Ptolemy, in the absence of the spherical trigonometric formulae that were discovered later. Nasir's treatise contains much more than Menelaus' theorem, since we find there a complete system of spherical trigonometric formulae, with complete proofs. The treatise includes at the same time invaluable historical information on the discovery of the trigonometric formulae by the Arab mathematicians of the Middle-Ages and the transformation of the field of spherical trigonometry that this discovery led to. The final version of this paper will appear in the book Spherical geometry in the eighteenth century, I: Euler, Lagrange and Lambert, edited by Renzo Caddeo and Athanase Papadopoulos, Springer, 2026.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Athanase Papadopoulos. 2026-05-05. Spherical trigonometry before the modern era:The treatise of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03516

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO