An $\widetilde{O} (n^{3/7})$ Round Parallel Algorithm for Matroid Bases

Sanjeev Khanna; Aaron Putterman; Junkai Song

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.03979

An $\widetilde{O} (n^{3/7})$ Round Parallel Algorithm for Matroid Bases

Sanjeev Khanna·Aaron Putterman·Junkai Song

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the parallel (adaptive) complexity of the classic problem of finding a basis in an $n$-element matroid, given access via an \emph{independence oracle}. In this model, the algorithm may submit polynomially many independence queries in each round, and the central question is: how many rounds are necessary and sufficient to find a basis? Karp, Upfal, and Wigderson (FOCS~1985, JCSS~1988; hereafter KUW) initiated this study, showing that $O(\sqrt{n})$ adaptive rounds suffice for any matroid, and that $\widetilde\Omega(n^{1/3})$ rounds are necessary even for partition matroids. This left a substantial gap that persisted for nearly four decades, until Khanna, Putterman, and Song (FOCS~2025; hereafter KPS) achieved $\widetilde O(n^{7/15})$ rounds, the first improvement since~KUW. In this work, we make another conceptual advance beyond KPS, giving a new algorithm that finds a matroid basis in $\widetilde O(n^{3/7})$ rounds. We develop a structural and algorithmic framework that brings a new lens to the analysis of random circuits, moving from reasoning about individual elements to understanding how dependencies span multiple elements simultaneously.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sanjeev Khanna, Aaron Putterman, Junkai Song. 2026-05-05. An $\widetilde{O} (n^{3/7})$ Round Parallel Algorithm for Matroid Bases. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03979

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗