Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.12852

Multitask Multimodal Fusion with Tabular Foundation Models for Peak and Durability Prediction of Pertussis Booster Response

Divya Sitani
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Pertussis booster vaccination produces immune responses that vary widely across individuals in both peak magnitude and long-term durability. These two phases are governed by partly distinct biological compartments:peak reflects acute B-cell activation and antibody secretion, while durability reflects the establishment of long-term humoral memory. Yet most computational models target only one, missing the full boost-and-wane trajectory. Jointly predicting both is non-trivial because the two endpoints are biologically dissociated rather than redundant; samples are small, modalities are heterogeneous with structured missingness, and the two tasks rely on different measurement windows. We propose a multi-task contrastive multimodal fusion architecture combining frozen TabPFN-v2 per-modality encoders, a dual-label supervised contrastive loss that treats two subjects as a positive pair if they agree on the Task 1 label or the Task 2 label, modality dropout calibrated to empirical missingness, and missingness-masked attention fusion. Applied to a curated subset of the CMI-PB pertussis booster dataset (n = 158 subjects, four modalities, 44.9% with at least one modality missing; Spearman r = -0.58 between peak and durability, n = 96), the model achieves test AUROC 0.797 (95% CI [0.621, 0.948]) for peak response and 0.755 (95% CI [0.519, 0.945]) for durability, with both significant under joint label permutation (N = 1000; p = 0.002 and p = 0.045). Across logistic regression, XGBoost, and MLP baselines on raw features and on TabPFN embeddings, the proposed model is the only one whose 95% CIs lie above chance on both tasks simultaneously. Per-modality contribution analyses recover task-specific modality contributions consistent with the underlying immunology: peak prediction is carried by cytokine signatures, while durability is carried by baseline antibody features.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGq-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Divya Sitani. 2026-05-13. Multitask Multimodal Fusion with Tabular Foundation Models for Peak and Durability Prediction of Pertussis Booster Response. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12852

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗