SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.14428

Branch-width of represented matroids in matrix multiplication time

Abstract

For an $n$-element matroid $M$ given by an $n \times n$ matrix representation over a finite field $\mathbb F$ and an integer $k$, we present an algorithm with running time $O_{k,\mathbb F}(n^2)+O(n^\omega)$ that either finds a branch-decomposition of $M$ of width at most $k$, or confirms that the branch-width of $M$ is more than $k$, where $\omega < 2.3714$ is the matrix multiplication exponent, and the $O_{k,\mathbb F}(\cdot)$-notation hides factors that depend on $k$ and $\mathbb F$ in a computable manner. All previous algorithms, including Hlin\v{e}n\'y and Oum [SIAM J. Comput. (2008)] and Jeong, Kim, and Oum [SIAM J. Discrete Math. (2021)], have cubic-time bottlenecks. Moreover, if the input matrix representation is given in standard form, our algorithm runs in $O_{k,\mathbb F}(n^2)$ time, since $O(n^\omega)$ time is only needed for finding a standard form of the input matrix. When $M$ is given by an $m \times n$ matrix, the overhead for finding a standard form is $O(mn \min(m,n)^{\omega-2})$. As corollaries, we obtain faster algorithms for rank-width of directed graphs and path-width of matroids represented over a fixed finite field. Furthermore, we also present an approximation algorithm for finding branch-width that works on infinite fields provided that the input matrix is in standard form and contains a bounded number of distinct values of entries. To suggest that our algorithm is optimal, we observe that for every field $\mathbb F$, deciding whether the branch-width of a matroid represented over $\mathbb F$ is $0$ is as hard as deciding whether a square matrix over $\mathbb F$ is singular. Under the assumption that singularity testing requires $\Omega(n^\omega)$-time, this implies that the overhead of $O(n^{\omega})$ is unavoidable. We also show strengthenings of this observation to rule out some approximations under this assumption.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mujin Choi, Tuukka Korhonen, Sang-il Oum. 2026-05-14. Branch-width of represented matroids in matrix multiplication time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14428

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS