SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.16667

DialSort: Non-Comparative Integer Sorting via the Self-Indexing Principle: Architecture, Implementation, and Substrate-Aware Analysis

Abstract

Sorting over bounded-universe integer keys has traditionally relied on counting sort and radix sort, both of which incur mandatory prefix-sum passes, auxiliary scatter buffers, or multiple permutation passes. This paper introduces DialSort, a non-comparative sorting architecture based on the self-indexing principle: each integer key simultaneously encodes its value and its canonical position in the ordered address space [0,U-1]. DialSort eliminates the prefix-sum pass entirely by treating the histogram H as the canonical ordered representation, not as an intermediate structure. To support parallel ingestion without serialization, we introduce the Conflict Resolution Network (CRN), a pipelined additive reduction tree that resolves concurrent writes using equality checks exclusively, with no magnitude comparisons. Formal proofs establish O(n+U) sequential and O(n/k + log k + U) parallel time bounds. A software prototype on an 8-thread Intel x86-64 achieves 39.77x speedup over std::sort and peak throughput of 115.9 M keys/s. Against Classic Counting Sort, DialSort wins 46 of 48 configurations. Against IPS4o, DialSort outperforms it in 24 of 48 sequential and 29 of 48 parallel configurations. Against ska_sort, it wins 46 of 48 configurations. All 208 benchmark configurations passed correctness verification. DialSort is not a universal replacement for comparison-based sorting, but a domain-specialized architecture for bounded-universe workloads where sorting reduces to a geometric read over memory. Benchmark source and five open interactive simulators are released alongside this paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Narvaez. 2026-05-15. DialSort: Non-Comparative Integer Sorting via the Self-Indexing Principle: Architecture, Implementation, and Substrate-Aware Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16667

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS