SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.17540

One-Shot Klein Cutting Planes for Lipschitz Geodesically Convex Optimization in Hyperbolic Space

Abstract

Motivated by the COLT 2023 open problem of Criscitiello, Mart\'inez-Rubio, and Boumal on deterministic first-order methods for Lipschitz geodesically convex optimization on Hadamard manifolds, we study hyperbolic space \[ \HH^d_{-\kappaC^2} =\{X\in\R^{d+1}:\ipL{X}{X}=-1,\ X_0>0\}, \qquad \ip{U}{V}_X=\kappaC^{-2}\ipL{U}{V}. \] For every geodesically convex $M$-Lipschitz function \[ f:\bar B_{\HH}(x_0,r)\to\R,\qquad s=\kappaC r, \] we give a one-shot Klein cutting-plane method returning a queried point $\hat x$ such that \[ f(\hat x)-\min_{\bar B_{\HH}(x_0,r)}f\le \eps Mr \] after at most \[ \left\lceil 2d(d+1)\log\!\left(\frac{16\sinh s\cosh s}{s\eps}\right) \right\rceil \] oracle calls. For $d\ge2$, each localization step costs $O(d^2)$ arithmetic operations; for $d=1$, an interval variant gives the same oracle bound. Hence \[ N=O\bigl(d^2(s+\log(e/\eps))\bigr) =O\bigl(d^2\zeta_s\log(e/\eps)\bigr), \qquad \zeta_s=s/\tanh s . \] Compared with the constant-curvature construction associated with the COLT problem, this replaces chained curvature--accuracy dependence by additive dependence. The proof does not rely on convexity of the Klein pullback, which is generally only quasiconvex. Instead, every Riemannian subgradient halfspace becomes an exact Euclidean central cut: for $\theta=\kappaC\dist(X,Y)$, \[ \ip{g}{\log_XY}_X =\frac{\theta}{\kappaC^2\sinh\theta}\ipL{g}{Y}, \] and tangency at $X$ converts $\ipL{g}{Y}\le0$ into \[ \gbar^{\mathsf T}(u-c)\le0,\qquad u=\Phi(Y),\ c=\Phi(X). \] Thus one fixed Euclidean ellipsoid localizes the hyperbolic ball, and curvature enters only through \[ \log\!\left(\frac{\sinh s\cosh s}{s\eps}\right) =\log(1/\eps)+2s-\log(4s)+O(e^{-4s}). \] The general Hadamard-manifold problem remains open.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yutong Zhang, Yaoran Yang, Yifan Zhu, Wentao Zhang. 2026-05-17. One-Shot Klein Cutting Planes for Lipschitz Geodesically Convex Optimization in Hyperbolic Space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17540

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS