SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.20012

Testing Heteroskedasticity Under Measurement Error

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel approach to detect heteroskedasticity in regression models with regressors contaminated by measurement error. Specifically, inspired by the integrated conditional moment (ICM) approach, we construct test statistics based on a deconvolved residual-marked empirical process and establish their asymptotic properties in both ordinary smooth and supersmooth cases, assuming the measurement error distribution is known. The issue of an unknown measurement error distribution is addressed by employing estimators of the measurement error characteristic function based on repeated measurements. Furthermore, depending on whether the measurement error distribution is known or not, to obtain critical values from the case-dependent limiting null distributions, we propose two computationally attractive multiplier bootstrap methods where the "parameter estimation effect" is successfully addressed. Finally, simulation results and empirical studies about corn yields and household budget shares confirm the favorable properties of the proposed tests.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaojun Song, Jichao Yuan. 2026-05-19. Testing Heteroskedasticity Under Measurement Error. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM