Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.21248

Distributed Stochastic Graph Algorithms

Keren Censor-Hillel·Aditi Dudeja·George Giakkoupis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study stochastic graph optimization problems in a novel distributed setting. As in the standard centralized setting, a random subgraph $G^*$ of a known base graph $G$ is realized by including each edge $e$ independently with a known probability $p_e$, and we must solve an optimization problem on $G^*$ despite uncertainty about its edges. In the standard setting, to cope with this uncertainty, the algorithm can query any edge of $G$ to learn if the edge exists in $G^*$, and its complexity is the number of queried edges. The distributed setting incorporates uncertainty in a natural manner, by having each vertex know only about its own edges in $G^*$ (and only communicate over them), and the complexity is measured by the number of synchronous communication rounds. We establish that distributed stochastic algorithms can be drastically faster than their non-stochastic counterparts and overcome known lower bounds, by showing fast distributed approximation algorithms for maximum matching, minimum vertex cover, and minimum dominating set.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Keren Censor-Hillel, Aditi Dudeja, George Giakkoupis. 2026-05-20. Distributed Stochastic Graph Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21248

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗