Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.21871

Refocusing spacetimes need not be strongly refocusing

Friedrich Bauermeister
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We prove that there are globally hyperbolic spacetimes which are refocusing but not strongly refocusing. In fact, every globally hyperbolic strongly refocusing spacetime of dimension at least $3$ admits globally hyperbolic metrics which are refocusing but not strongly refocusing. This answers a question by Chernov, Kinlaw, and Sadykov. We then prove that globally hyperbolic spacetimes which are Legendrian refocusing (a notion introduced in this paper) admit globally hyperbolic strongly refocusing metrics. As a corollary, a contact Bott-Samelson type result by Frauenfelder, Labrousse, and Schlenk can be applied to Legendrian refocusing spacetimes to show that the Cauchy surface of a globally hyperbolic Legendrian refocusing spacetime of dimension at least $3$ is compact, that its fundamental group is finite, and that its universal cover has the integral cohomology ring of a compact rank one symmetric space (CROSS).

Explore related subjects

math.DGgr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Friedrich Bauermeister. 2026-05-21. Refocusing spacetimes need not be strongly refocusing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21871

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG↗