SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2605.21946

Optimal $e^{(\gamma+o(1))n}$-Approximation of the Permanent of Positive Semidefinite Matrices

Abstract

We determine, up to lower-order terms in the exponent, the best possible deterministic polynomial-time approximation ratio for the permanent of a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix. If $A\succeq 0$ has no zero diagonal entry, $d=\operatorname{rank}(A)$, $A=VV^\dagger$ with $V\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times d}$ full column rank, and $v_1,\ldots,v_n$ are the rows of $V$, define \[ \Phi(V)=\max_{X\succ 0} \left\{\sum_{i=1}^n \log(v_i^\dagger Xv_i)+\log\det X-\operatorname{tr} X+d\right\}, \qquad \widehat P(A)=e^{\Phi(V)}. \] We prove the exact sandwich \[ e^{-\gamma n}\widehat P(A)\le \operatorname{per}(A)\le \widehat P(A). \] Here $\gamma$ is the Euler--Mascheroni constant. Since the maximization is concave, this gives a deterministic polynomial-time $e^{(\gamma+\varepsilon)n}$-approximation for every $\varepsilon>0$. Combined with the previous $e^{(\gamma-\varepsilon)n}$-hardness of approximation for positive semidefinite permanents, this resolves the optimal exponential approximation ratio for deterministic polynomial-time algorithms as $e^{(\gamma+o(1))n}$, assuming $\mathrm{P}\ne\mathrm{NP}$. The proof is an entropy argument applied to the standard Wick integral formula for $\operatorname{per}(A)$; the loss is exactly $\gamma$ per factor because $\mathbb{E}[\log T]=-\gamma$ for $T\sim\operatorname{Exp}(1)$. The result was obtained through interactions with GPT 5.5 Pro Extended: the first author's interaction was one-shot, while the second author's was a separate multi-turn interaction with high-level guidance. Both authors verified the theorem and proof. Codex was used to assemble and typeset the manuscript.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nima Anari, Farzam Ebrahimnejad. 2026-05-21. Optimal $e^{(\gamma+o(1))n}$-Approximation of the Permanent of Positive Semidefinite Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS