A Comparative Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of the US High-Voltage Transmission Network

Abstract

Modern economies depend critically on high-voltage power transmission networks. Yet this infrastructure is routinely disrupted by natural hazards ranging from earthquakes and floods to tornadoes and geomagnetic storms. Risk assessments have historically addressed hazards in isolation, leaving no common basis for comparing economic impacts across the full hazard portfolio. This study addresses this gap by developing an integrated framework linking hazard characterization, fragility modeling, and macroeconomic impact propagation. The framework is applied consistently across nine primary hazards and one compound freezing rain and wind gust hazard. Using national hazard datasets and a US high-voltage transmission network of over 13,000 line segments and 10,000 substations, we derive failure probabilities, expected damage, affected population, and downstream economic output losses. Among individual hazards, tropical cyclone wind produces the largest expected daily damage at $137 M/day, followed by lightning at $87 M/day, earthquake at $47 M/day, flood at $46 M/day, tornado at $42 M/day, and landslide at $34 M/day. Downstream economic output losses are largest for tornado at $4.93 B/day, followed by flood at $3.59 B/day and earthquake at $3.02 B/day. A 250-year geomagnetic storm produces $2.07 B/day, placing space weather within the range of major terrestrial hazards. The compound freezing rain and wind gust scenario produces the largest stress-test disruption, affecting 237.4 M people and yielding a modeled downstream output loss of $85.16 B/day. These results should be interpreted as first-order bounding estimates, with the compound scenario representing an upper-bound stress test. Overall, the framework establishes a consistent baseline for prioritizing investments in transmission network resilience.