SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.02017

PliableBVS: A flexible Bayesian variable selection method for modeling interactions with mandatory modifying variables

Abstract

High-dimensional interaction models are useful for studying, for example, how a large set of variables of interest, such as gene expression or other omics features, interact with a smaller set of modifying variables, such as clinical covariates. In this context, the pliable lasso has recently been proposed as an efficient method for screening large numbers of potential interaction terms under an asymmetric weak hierarchical constraint. In this work, we extend this framework by introducing PliableBVS, a Bayesian variable selection approach that preserves the hierarchical structure of the pliable lasso while inducing sparsity through spike-and-slab priors. The proposed model combines the continuous shrinkage effect of Bayesian lasso with a hierarchical spike-and-slab prior formulation that has two layers of decision variables: one governing the inclusion of main effects and another controlling the inclusion of interaction effects which is conditional on the inclusion of the corresponding main effects. This structure enables simultaneous selection of high-dimensional main and interaction effects within a coherent probabilistic framework. In simulation studies the proposed method outperforms the original pliable lasso in identifying active main and interaction effects, reducing false discoveries, and improving prediction accuracy in most scenarios. Applications with data from a labor onset study and a preeclampsia study demonstrate that PliableBVS selects biologically meaningful features and interactions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Theophilus Quachie Asenso, Zhi Zhao, Maren-Helene Langeland Degnes, Marie Cecilie Paasche Roland, Trond Melbye Michelsen, Manuela Zucknick. 2026-06-01. PliableBVS: A flexible Bayesian variable selection method for modeling interactions with mandatory modifying variables. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME